Demand-Side Management and Energy Efficiency Revisited
By M. Auffhammer, C. Blumstein, M. Fowlie. 2008
110 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Building and Construction, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ac344387aee54d9746d6f6964d711b39fdacb82
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Building and Construction
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- Pedro Linares
- Xavier Labandeira Villot
- Lucas W. Davis
- J. Boomhower
- David I. Stern
- C. Cattaneo
- Lutz Kilian
- X. Labandeira
Citations in the corpus
- A credible approach for measuring inframarginal participation in energy efficiency programs (2014, background): “Thereisalsoasmallliteraturewhichaddressesadditionality indirectly by comparing realized aggregate savings at the utility level to engineering estimates (Loughran and Kulick, 2004; Auffhammer et al., 2008; Arimura et al., 2012).”
- Smart Meter Devices and The Effect of Feedback on Residential Electricity Consumption: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Northern Ireland (2013, unknown): “See Loughran and Kulick (2004) and Auffhammer et al. (2008) who compute the cost per kWh saved by DSM programs in the US in the 1990s.”
- Saving Power to Conserve Your Reputation? The Effectiveness of Private versus Public Information (2012, unknown): “…incentives, information policies are a relatively inexpensive way to encourage conservation, especially in this age of mass information and telecommunication technology and have the potential to reduce the high cost of energy efficiency demand-side management programs (Auffhammer et al., 2008).”
- Energy Efficiency: Economics and Policy (2010, background): “Joskow and Marron (1992) or Loughran and Kulick (2004) found that reductions were lower than expected and costs higher than utilities’ estimates (although Aufhammer et al. (2008) revised Loughran and Kulick’s data and found that the utilities results could not be rejected).”