Consider the lilies: systematics of liliales
By P. Rudall, Karen Stobart, W. Hong, J. Conran, C. Furness, G. Kite, Mark W. Chase. 2000
93 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2a6a9e01b82a3c78206c481615d1bf7a05a73269
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- D. Soltis
- Pamela S. Soltis
- Ilia J. Leitch
- Jaume Pellicer
- K. Bremer
- G. Bernardello
- P. Rudall
- M. Remizowa
Citations in the corpus
- The largest eukaryotic genome of them all (2010, background): “ADDITIONAL KEYWORDS: C-value – flow cytometry – genome size – guard cells – Kinugasa – Melanthiaceae – Paris – stomata.”
- An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV (2016, background): “(1985), APG (1998) had already reduced Calochortaceae, Petermanniaceae, Trilliaceae, Tricyrtidaceae and Uvulariaceae, and we may yet include Philesiaceae and Rhipogonaceae in Smilacaceae (following previous authors on account of their spinose pollen; Rudall et al., 2000b).”
- Evolutionary History of the Monocot Flower1 (2010, background): “For example, septal nectaries are absent from all Liliales and all Orchidaceae, and in both groups some species instead possess specialized nectar-secreting regions on their tepals, sometimes in a spur (Rudall et al., 2000; Smets et al., 2000; Rudall, 2002).”
- A SYSTEMATIC SURVEY OF FLORAL NECTARIES (2007, background): “, complete fusion of carpel margins, represents a highly consistent and usefully predictive synapomorphy for this order (Rudall et al., 2000; Rudall, 2002).”