A SYSTEMATIC SURVEY OF FLORAL NECTARIES

By G. Bernardello. 2007

205 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The construction of classifications, as well as the understanding of biological diversity, depends upon a careful comparison of attributes of the organisms studied (Stuessy, 1990). It is widely known that data from diverse sources showing differences from taxon to taxon are of systematic significance. During the 20th century, systematists have emphasized that their discipline involves a synthesis of all knowledge (Stevens, 1994) or, in other words, the variation of as many relevant characters as possible should be incorporated into the natural system to be constructed. The extent to which particular characters are constant or labile will determine their usefulness to systematics. In general, more conservative characters will be valuable in defining families and orders, whereas more labile characters may be useful at the generic and specific levels (Webb, 1984). There is no doubt that floral characters are among the most used in the classification of flowering plants. At the same time, they constitute essential features in diagnostic keys to taxa in both taxonomic treatments and Floras (Cronquist, 1981, 1988).

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/96ce6ab7f5080624895c4e0d47588857a0844d15

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

  1. M. Nepi
  2. E. Pacini
  3. P. K. Endress
  4. J. Doyle
  5. G. Bernardello
  6. Pamela S. Soltis
  7. D. Soltis
  8. Chelsea D. Specht

Citations in the corpus