Can encoding differences explain the benefits of directed forgetting in the list-method paradigm?

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Spacing and Testing Effects: A Deeply Critical, Lengthy, and At Times Discursive Review of the Literature (2010, background): “In fact, you do not even have to explicitly test people; metacognitive judgments or various disruptions of the rehearsal strategy between two lists also result in strategy changes (see Sahakyan & Delaney, 2003, 2005; Sahakyan, Delaney, & Kelley, 2004).”
The critical role of retrieval processes in release from proactive interference (2013, background): “…of the target list if the nontarget material was intentionally forgotten or subject to a context change (directed forgetting; context change; e.g., Sahakyan & Delaney, 2003, 2005), or by a reset of the encoding process supposed to make the encoding of the later target list as effective as the…”