Cognitive and Linguistic Processing in the Bilingual Mind

By Ellen Bialystok, Fergus I. M. Craik. 2010

463 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2a42b5fde6b1b1a3ce8d111b8c735f8f28db8865

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The bilingual advantage in phonetic learning* (2014, methodology): “These cognitive advantages include enhanced inhibitory control and selective attention in nonverbal conflict resolution tasks, such as the Stroop and Simon tasks (Bialystok & Craik, 2010; Bialystok & Viswanathan, 2009; Carlson & Meltzoff, 2008).”
Moving toward a neuroplasticity view of bilingualism, executive control, and aging (2014, background): “…of cognitive aging has emerged from work suggesting that age-related declines in executive control functions are buffered by life-long bilingualism (Bialystok & Craik, 2010; Bialystok, Craik, & Freedman, 2007; Bialystok, Craik, & Luk, 2012; Bialystok, Craik, Klein, & Viswanathan, 2004; Fernandes,…”
Second Language Proficiency and Cross-Language Lexical Activation (2012, background): “…proficiency co-occurs with increased attentional control (e.g., Segalowitz & Hulstijn, 2005) and cognitive control (e.g., Abutalebi & Green, 2007; Bialystok & Craik, 2010; Elston-Güttler, Paulmann, & Kotz, 2005), the ability to filter out irrelevant information (interference suppression) and to…”
Are there bilingual advantages on nonlinguistic interference tasks? Implications for the plasticity of executive control processes (2011, background): “This type of theoretical perspective has been developing in the literature, although somewhat vaguely (Bialystok, 2009a; Bialystok & Craik, 2010 ), but the bare bones of it are evinced nicely by Luk et al. (2010): “Unlike the bilinguals, monolinguals did not respond to facilitation and suppression ”
A Bilingual Advantage in Visual Language Discrimination in Infancy (2012, background): “…advantages of bilinguals is the additional computations that they must constantly make to inhibit one of their two languages, so that only one is used even though both are active and potentially available whenever they speak (Bialystok & Craik, 2010; Costa, Alario, & Sebastián-Gallés, 2009).”
Between Persistence and Flexibility: The Yin and Yang of Action Control (2015, background): “…is considerable evidence that bilinguals not only outperform monolinguals in various language tasks (even though bilinguals can show poorer performance early in learning), but they show superior performance in a number of non-lingual tasks as well (for an overview, see Bialystok & Craik, 2010).”
How Dual-Identity Processes Foster Creativity (2014, background): “…argue that individuals who enter new groups, and develop deep relationships with those groups, become better at cognitive switching (for review see Bialystok & Craik, 2010), integrating apparently inconsistent ideas (Benet-Martínez, Lee, & Leu, 2006; Tadmor & Tetlock, 2009), and recruiting from a…”