A Primer on Foreclosure

By Patrick Rey, Jean Tirole. 2007

648 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Media Technology, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2a2643402f26f4b1bb07d1b2782f23e8a4db871c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Media Technology

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Do Vertical Mergers Facilitate Upstream Collusion? Second Version (2005, neutral): “2See for example, the recent contributions by Chen (2001), Choi and Yi (2001), Riordan (1998), and Chen and Riordan (2003); see Rey and Tirole (2003) for a survey. vertical integration can facilitate the maintenance of monopoly profit levels for the industry as a whole, where all of these profits…”
Upstream horizontal mergers, vertical contracts, and bargaining (2007, background): “29 The monopolist's commitment problem also arises in settings in which there is unobservability of the contract terms (see e.g. O'Brien and Shaffer, 1992; McAfee and Schwartz, 1994; Rey and Tirole, 2006).”
Price Discrimination and Competition (2007, background): “Rossi and Allenby (1993) argue that firms should offer price reductions to households “that show loyalty toward other brands and yet are price sensitive” (p.”
Competition and antitrust in internet markets (2016, background): “According to Rey and Tirole (2007) a case of foreclosure is a dominant firm’s denial of access to an essential facility with the intent of extending market power from one segment of the market (the bottleneck segment) to an adjacent segment (the competitive segment).”
The Welfare Effects of Vertical Integration in Multichannel Television Markets (2015, background): “The theoretical literature on the pro- and anti-competitive impacts of vertical integration is vast (cf. Perry, 1990; Rey and Tirole, 2007; Riordan, 2008; Bresnahan and Levin, 2013), and typically contrasts potential efficiencies related to the elimination of double marginalization (Spengler, 1950)…”