The Welfare Effects of Vertical Integration in Multichannel Television Markets
By Gregory S. Crawford, R. Lee, Michael Whinston, Ali Yurukoglu. 2015
204 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5c623a38a5e354257a552b71e30af916173e276a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Matt Backus
- Michael Sinkinson
- Allan Collard-Wexler
- Christopher T. Conlon
- Michael Dinerstein
- Robin S. Lee
- Gautam Gowrisankaran
- Lauren Falcao Bergquist
Citations in the corpus
- Competition and Entry in Agricultural Markets: Experimental Evidence from Kenya (2020, background): “, vertically integrated units in Crawford et al. 2018 or firms with common investors in Backus, Conlon, and Sinkinson 2019b). In our setting, there are several features that could motivate a structural interpretation of the profit weight. Specifically, the structural profit weight encompasses releva”
- “Nash-in-Nash” Bargaining: A Microfoundation for Applied Work (2014, background): “Concurrently, an applied literature—both empirical and theoretical—has focused on surplus division within bilateral oligopoly environments with the goal of evaluating a range of industrial organization questions, including: the welfare impact of horizontal mergers (Chipty and Snyder, 1999), bundling”
- Common Ownership in America: 1980–2017 (2019, background): “…a function of the portfolio share which f comprises in s’s portfolio: αfs(βs) = βfsvf Y+ ∑ g βgsvg , where vf represents the 35It is important to note that Crawford et al. (2018) are not considering the common ownership hypothesis directly but rather examining incentives for vertical…”