Locality and Left Periphery

By Luigi Rizzi. 2004

711 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/29fe6b361349afb20cccd49a6b7876fd67e34243

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The Cartography of Syntactic Structures (2009, background): “…on the fine details of the generated structures, two research topics which can be pursued in parallel in a fully consistent manner, and along lines which can fruitfully interact (see Cinque 1999, section 6.2, Rizzi, 2004a, introduction and Belletti 2008, introduction, for relevant discussion).”
On the Form of Chains: Criterial Positions and ECP Effects. (2006, background): “But this would lead to the expectation of minimality effects across types of A'-extractions triggered by the non-specific feature (i.e., a Focus position should give rise to a minimality effect on Topic extraction, etc.) which are actually not found: locality effects are highly selective across A'co”
Anti-agreement, anti-locality and minimality. The syntax of dislocated subjects (2007, background): “This is achieved either by virtue of a subject being dislocated (the unmarked case), or by virtue of an operator occurring in what I assume, following Rizzi (1997, 2002) , is the elaborated CP periphery.”
The internal syntax of adverbial clauses (2010, background): “(Rizzi 2004: his (64a)) ‘I don’t know to whom you think that, your brother, we could entrust’ d ?”
Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies (2009, background): “This contrast, originally assumed to illustrate an argument – adjunct asymmetry (Lasnik and Saito, 1984), was later interpreted in terms of the D-linked (discourse-linked) – non-D-linked distinction ( Cinque, 1990; Rizzi, 1990); but even that may not be fully satisfactory.”
Negative Concord and (Multiple) Agree: A Case Study of West Flemish (2010, methodology): “34 As an anonymous reviewer points out, the structure in (36) is very reminiscent of a pattern that according to Starke (2001) and Rizzi (2004) creates no intervention effects.”
Broaden Your Views: Implicatures of Domain Widening and the Logicality of Language (2006, background): “As Rizzi (1990, 2004) argues extensively, heads can intervene only with respect to other heads and maximal projections with respect to other maximal projections.”
Does gender make a difference? Comparing the effect of gender on children's comprehension of relative clauses in Hebrew and Italian (2012, background): “…with respect to the computation of the locality principle can be expressed as in (13) ((29) in Friedmann et al., 2009), capitalizing on the featural approach to Relativized Minimality as developed in Starke (2001), and Rizzi (2004) (X = the target of movement; Z = the intervener; Y = the trace).”