Concentrated supply chain membership and financial performance: Chain‐ and firm‐level perspectives
By Danny Lanier, William F. Wempe, Zach G. Zacharia. 2010
201 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Management Information Systems
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/29c3aad64565f540681254d33d8f111b16f8d748
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
In Management Information Systems
- Yoon Hee Kim
- Philipp Wetzel
- D. Henderson
- Erik Hofmann
- Marcus A. Bellamy
- Manpreet S. Hora
- Soumen Ghosh
- Guangzhi Shang
Citations in the corpus
- The Effects of Major Customer Networks on Supplier Profitability (2017, background): “…customer was disclosed as a major customer of the supplier; and (5) the market share of customers (CSHARE), measured as the weighted average of the ratio of the customer’s sales to the total sales of firms available in Compustat and operating in the same industry, following Lanier et al. (2010).”
- Supply chain finance, financial constraints and corporate performance: An explorative network analysis and future research agenda (2019, background): “, a focal firm-customer dyad) is clearly too simplistic (Lanier et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2004; Cool and Henderson, 1998).”
- Financial benefits and risks of dependency in triadic supply chain relationships (2015, methodology): “The performance outcomes of relationship management have been a core interest of supply chain managers and scholars, thus spawning a wide array of research streams across disciplines (Gosman and Kohlbeck, 2009; Gulati and Sytch, 2007; Lanier et al., 2010; Patatoukas, 2012; Villena et al., 2011).”
- Global sourcing and quality recalls: An empirical study of outsourcing-supplier concentration-product recalls linkages (2014, background): “Literature has shown concentrated supply bases, as compared with more disperse supplier bases, have superior financial performance (Lanier et al., 2010), reduced inventory costs (Trevelen, 1987, Guimaraes et al., 2002), and benefits from scale economies through volume orders (Hahn et al., 1986).”
- The influence of supply network structure on firm innovation (2014, background): “Second, in addition to the potential knowledge gains, higher supply network interconnectedness can also help decrease transaction costs [56].”