Connecting Generative Adversarial Networks and Actor-Critic Methods

By David Pfau, Oriol Vinyals. 2016

197 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Both generative adversarial networks (GAN) in unsupervised learning and actor-critic methods in reinforcement learning (RL) have gained a reputation for being difficult to optimize. Practitioners in both fields have amassed a large number of strategies to mitigate these instabilities and improve training. Here we show that GANs can be viewed as actor-critic methods in an environment where the actor cannot affect the reward. We review the strategies for stabilizing training for each class of models, both those that generalize between the two and those that are particular to that model. We also review a number of extensions to GANs and RL algorithms with even more complicated information flow. We hope that by highlighting this formal connection we will encourage both GAN and RL communities to develop general, scalable, and stable algorithms for multilevel optimization with deep networks, and to draw inspiration across communities.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Reinforcement Learning, Generative Models

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Sergey Levine
  2. Simon Lacoste-Julien
  3. Dacheng Tao
  4. Yoshua Bengio
  5. Pieter Abbeel
  6. Gauthier Gidel
  7. Ioannis Mitliagkas
  8. Quoc V. Le

In Reinforcement Learning

  1. Sergey Levine
  2. Yuxi Li
  3. Pieter Abbeel
  4. Shimon Whiteson
  5. Chelsea Finn
  6. Jakob N. Foerster
  7. Karl Tuyls
  8. Yevgen Chebotar

In Generative Models

  1. Simon Lacoste-Julien
  2. Gauthier Gidel
  3. Ioannis Mitliagkas
  4. Waïss Azizian
  5. Pascal Vincent
  6. Yoshua Bengio
  7. Lars M. Mescheder
  8. Hugo Berard

Citations in the corpus