The Internet and Democratic Discourse: Exploring The Prospects of Online Deliberative Forums Extending the Public Sphere
By Lincoln Dahlberg. 2001
724 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/29a270601c57034dbdcc96a9b3052d66be18b46a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
- Marco C. Yzer
- Brian G. Southwell
- Reuben Binns
- Nigel R. Shadbolt
- Chenyan Jia
- Soroush Vosoughi
- M. V. Kleek
- Lincoln Dahlberg
In Political Science and International Relations
In Sociology and Political Science
- Reuben Binns
- Marco C. Yzer
- Brian G. Southwell
- Øystein Sæbø
- Jeremy Rose
- Nigel R. Shadbolt
- Chenyan Jia
- Soroush Vosoughi
Citations in the corpus
- The Roles of Interpersonal Communication in Mass Media Campaigns (2007, background): “for logical coherence (Herring, 1999) or deliberativeness (Dahlberg, 2001; Graham & Witschge, 2003; Stromer-Galley & LeBret, 2005). Graham and Witschge, for example, used textual analysis to assess whether Internet forums meet the criteria of critical debate, reciprocity, and reflexivity. That tende”
- A Transformer-based Framework for Neutralizing and Reversing the Political Polarity of News Articles (2021, background): “Thus, it is of importance to expose people to more ideologically diverse news stories [23].”
- Measuring Deliberation’s Content: A Coding Scheme (2007, neutral): “Dahlberg (2001), for example, in his model of ideal deliberation requires “exchange and critique of reasoned moral-practical validity claims” (p. 623).”
- The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area (2008, background): “The use of ICT tools such as GIS systems may empower new groups to participate in decision making processes (Elwood, 2001), but lack of representativity is a major obstacle for the development of online public spheres (Dahlberg, 2001; Schneider, 1996).”
- Rethinking the fragmentation of the cyberpublic: from consensus to contestation (2007, neutral): “through its rules, management and design (Dahlberg, 2001).”
- Re-constructing digital democracy: An outline of four ‘positions’ (2011, background): “…e-democracy articulations, including cyber-feminist (for example, Fernandez et al., 2004; Fuller, 2004; Hall, 1996; Plant, 1996), communitarian (see Dahlberg, 2001a), cyber-liber-tarian (see Dahlberg, 2010), liberal digital commonism (for example, Benkler, 2006; Lessig, 2001), and postmodern (for…”
- Like Trainer, Like Bot? Inheritance of Bias in Algorithmic Content Moderation (2017, background): “Online platforms, as ‘curators of public discourse’ [18] or digital extensions of the public sphere [12], have become important spaces for opinion and debate.”
- Agreement and Disagreement in Group Deliberation: Effects on Deliberation Satisfaction, Future Engagement, and Decision Legitimacy (2009, neutral): “Keywords The burgeoning literature on democratic deliberation theory (Barber, 1984; Bessette, 1994; Bohman, 1996; Cohen, 1997; Dahlberg, 2001; Elster, 1998; Fishkin & Laslett, 2003; Gutmann & Thompson, 1996; Habermas, 1984; Macedo, 1999; Warren, 1992) and research (Barabas, 2004; Conover, Searing,…”