Valuing enhancements to forest recreation using choice experiment and contingent behaviour methods

180 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Spatial preference heterogeneity in forest recreation (2013, methodology): “However, we estimated the RUM model using stated preference data obtained from a discrete choice experiment (Adamowicz et al., 1994; Hanley et al., 1998; Hanley et al., 2002; Christie et al., 2007).”
Combining ecological and recreational aspects in national park management: A choice experiment application (2011, unknown): “From this perspecive our work is close to Christie et al. (2007) who used CE to value changes in visitor welfare for a range of improvements in recreational facilities in forests.”
Valuing biodiversity enhancement in New Zealand's planted forests: Socioeconomic and spatial determinants of willingness-to-pay (2014, background): “Christie et al. (2007) employed a series of stated “choice experiments” alongside contingent behaviour methods and found that cyclists, horse riders, nature watchers and general forest recreationists would be willing to pay up to £19 per person per visit to support a proposed programme that would…”