Mapping and phasing of structural variation in patient genomes using nanopore sequencing

By Mircea Cretu Stancu, Markus J. van Roosmalen, I. Renkens, Marleen M Nieboer, Sjors Middelkamp, J. de Ligt, Giulia Pregno, D. Giachino, G. Mandrile, J. Espejo Valle-Inclan and 7 more. Nature Communications, 2017

370 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Despite improvements in genomics technology, the detection of structural variants (SVs) from short-read sequencing still poses challenges, particularly for complex variation. Here we analyse the genomes of two patients with congenital abnormalities using the MinION nanopore sequencer and a novel computational pipeline—NanoSV. We demonstrate that nanopore long reads are superior to short reads with regard to detection of de novo chromothripsis rearrangements. The long reads also enable efficient phasing of genetic variations, which we leveraged to determine the parental origin of all de novo chromothripsis breakpoints and to resolve the structure of these complex rearrangements. Additionally, genome-wide surveillance of inherited SVs reveals novel variants, missed in short-read data sets, a large proportion of which are retrotransposon insertions. We provide a first exploration of patient genome sequencing with a nanopore sequencer and demonstrate the value of long-read sequencing in mapping and phasing of SVs for both clinical and research applications. The detection of structural variants can be difficult with short-read sequencing technology, especially when variants are highly complex. Here, the authors use a MinION nanopore sequencer to analyse two patient genomes and develop NanoSV to map known and novel structural variants in long read data.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cancer Research, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2948751b1ef3c2ba1b39f0916be26e6a70f52384

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Nastassia Gobet
  2. M. Mahmoud
  3. Matthew E. Ritchie
  4. Diana Ivette Cruz-Dávalos
  5. Fritz J. Sedlazeck
  6. Christophe Dessimoz
  7. Luke Zappia
  8. Ninon Mounier

In Cancer Research

  1. Matthew E. Ritchie
  2. J. de Ridder
  3. Luke Zappia
  4. Wigard P. Kloosterman
  5. Franka J. Rang

In Molecular Biology

  1. M. Mahmoud
  2. Xueyi Dong
  3. Nastassia Gobet
  4. Matthew E. Ritchie
  5. Diana Ivette Cruz-Dávalos
  6. Fritz J. Sedlazeck
  7. Shian Su
  8. Christophe Dessimoz

Citations in the corpus