The future of outcomes measurement: item banking, tailored short-forms, and computerized adaptive assessment

By D. Cella, R. Gershon, J. Lai, Seung W. Choi. Quality of Life Research, 2007

585 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Initial Adult Health Item Banks and First Wave Testing of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS™) Network: 2005–2008 (2010, unknown): “The result of the analyses described earlier was a set of 11 calibrated item banks that would support computerized adaptive testing (CAT) and development of multiple short forms of varying length [27].”
Development of A Promis Item Bank to Measure Pain Interference (2010, background): “The National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) initiative [10,11,20,41,42,48] targeted four pain subdomains: interference, quality, behaviors and intensity.”
Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations (2012, methodology): “When determining which PRO questionnaire to use, considerations include generic versus disease-specific questionnaires, profile versus preference-based measures, single versus multi-item scales, and static versus dynamic questionnaires [11, 27–35] (Table 1).”
ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SOCIAL MEDIA USE AND DEPRESSION AMONG U.S. YOUNG ADULTS (2016, methodology): “[27] The PROMIS depression scale was developed using item response theory to promote greater precision and decrease respondent burden.[28] Specifically, the PROMIS depression scale has been correlated and validated with other commonly used depression instruments, including the Center for Epidemiolog”