Efficient and inefficient aspects of residential energy behaviour: What are the policy instruments for change?

By A. Lindén, A. Carlsson-kanyama, Björn Eriksson. 2006

413 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/29239f93e0751e29b4f546eab6b3b92956439bc6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

Determinants and policy implications for household electricity-saving behaviour: Evidence from Beijing, China (2011, result): “Contrary to many previous research studies (e.g., Sardianou, 2007; Linden and Carlsson-Kanyama, 2006; Viklund, 2004), the logistic regression results provide limited support for the environment awareness.”
Adoption of energy efficient technologies by households – Barriers, policies and agent-based modelling studies (2019, neutral): “Type of policy instrument Policy instrument Policy directed at References Economic, financial and market based instruments Taxes (reductions, credits, exemptions, energy tax) Households [4,15] Subsidies and grants Households [4,15–17] Tradable white certificates Intermediary parties [4,15,18–21] Sof”
What's driving energy efficient appliance label awareness and purchase propensity? (2010, background): “9 for environmental preservation, and generally lower propensities to carry out energy efficiency improvements (Linden, Carlsson-Kanyama, and Eriksson, 2006; Carlsson-Kanyama, Linden, and Eriksson, 2005; Torgler et al., 2008; Walsh, 1989).”
Understanding the spectrum of residential energy consumption: A quantile regression approach (2010, background): “While smaller houses would consume less energy than larger ones, temperaments of households, incentives for maintenance, etc., ll rights reserved. rstanding the spectrum of r l.2010.06.028 also contribute immensely to the variation in energy use by households (Lindén et al., 2006).”
Understanding the spectrum of residential energy-saving behaviours: French evidence using disaggregated data (2016, neutral): “…recognises that domestic energy use depends on factors such as energy price, climate, and building and household characteristics but also on the household-ers’ energy-saving behaviours (Barr et al., 2005; Branco et al., 2004; Lind´en et al., 2006; Fabi et al., 2012; Mizobuchi and Takeuchi, 2013).”
Information Strategies and Energy Conservation Behavior: A Meta-analysis of Experimental Studies from 1975-2012 - eScholarship (2013, neutral): “Despite the direct financial benefits of saving energy, research indicates that providing information about the cost of energy use does not necessarily affect energy use behavior among households (Lindén et al., 2006).”
Saving Power to Conserve Your Reputation? The Effectiveness of Private versus Public Information (2012, positive): “Despite the direct financial benefits of saving energy, research indicates that providing information about the cost of energy use does not necessarily affect energy use behavior among households (Lindén et al., 2006).”
Applying institutional theory to the low-carbon energy transition (2016, background): “The first is the identity as an “energy saver” which incentivises an individual to overtly curtail energy use through, for example, adjusting the space heating or cooling, and to buy appliances which are obviously green and efficient (Linden et al., 2006).”