The circumplex model: Methods and research applications.

By M. Gurtman, Aaron L. Pincus. 2003

186 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/28e3932cb2db3973a0487bd60de04aff4ffa958b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Richard M. Ryan
2. Kennon M. Sheldon
3. T. Kasser
4. Maarten Vansteenkiste
5. Youngmee Kim
6. Bart Soenens
7. Edward L. Deci
8. Robert J. Vallerand

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. T. Kasser
2. Richard M. Ryan
3. Kennon M. Sheldon
4. M. Gurtman
5. K. A. Dickinson
6. Robert J. Vallerand
7. Aaron L. Pincus
8. Youngmee Kim

In Social Psychology

1. T. Kasser
2. Richard M. Ryan
3. Kennon M. Sheldon
4. Maarten Vansteenkiste
5. Robert J. Vallerand
6. Edward L. Deci
7. Bart Soenens
8. Youngmee Kim

Citations in the corpus

• The structure of goal contents across 15 cultures. (2005, methodology): “Although, CFA is wellsuited to analyze interrelation among latent variables, it cannot test the circumplex assumptions as defined by Gurtman and Pincus (2003). However, CIRCUM has been elaborated for this specific purpose.”
• Exploring Personality with the Interpersonal Circumplex (2009, methodology): “As we have argued elsewhere (Gurtman & Pincus, 2003), the main contribution of exploratory methods is to provide a spatial representation of the data that can then be evaluated informally for fit to a circular structure.”
• Interpersonal analysis of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. (2003, methodology): “Procedures for evaluating IIP-C data are based on circumplex logic and have been well-articulated across several sources (Alden et al., 1990; Gurtman, 1994; Gurtman & Balikrishnan, 1998; Gurtman & Pincus, 2003).”