Can biological invertebrate traits resolve effects of multiple stressors on running water ecosystems

By B. Statzner, L. Bêche. 2010

436 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/28df625b97ca7f3dd39f0161f4320bcb6ad04899

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. G. Grenouillet
2. Julian D. Olden
3. J. Heino
4. Dénes Schmera
5. T. Erős
6. N. LeRoy Poff
7. L. Brown
8. Meryl C. Mims

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. J. Heino
2. Julian D. Olden
3. T. Erős
4. G. Grenouillet
5. Dénes Schmera
6. N. LeRoy Poff
7. Meryl C. Mims
8. L. Brown

Citations in the corpus

• Rapid loss of glacial ice reveals stream community assembly processes (2012, background): “Keywords: assembly, deterministic, Glacier Bay, macroinvertebrate, niche filtering, river, stochastic, traits Received 9 January 2012 and accepted 11 February 2012”
• A macroecological perspective of trait patterns in stream communities (2013, background): “Although the intensive research has also led to a few general reviews on organisms’ traits, these former reviews have mostly dealt with applied topics (Bonada et al., 2006; Statzner & Beche, 2010) or have been largely restricted to macroinvertebrates (Verberk et al., 2008, Menezes et al., 2010).”
• Cryptic Biodiversity in Streams: A Comparison of Macroinvertebrate Communities Based on Morphological and DNA Barcode Identifications (2014, background): “…applications to biomonitoring that refer to species traits but actually use genus- or family-level characteristics (e.g., Poff 1997, Poff et al. 2006, Heino et al. 2007, Statzner and Bêche 2010, Heino 2013) that (often unknowingly) homogenize species-level differences (e.g., Janzen et al. 2012).”
• A trait-based approach to assess the vulnerability of European aquatic insects to climate change (2013, background): “…resolve the effects of multiple stressors on river ecosystems (e.g., Poff, 1997; Dolédec et al., 1999; Usseglio-Polatera et al., 2000; Statzner et al., 2001; Dolédec et al., 2006; Statzner & Bêche, 2010; see also Menezes et al., 2010 for a review of the ecological background and case studies).”
• Understanding and predicting the combined effects of climate change and land‐use change on freshwater macroinvertebrates and fish (2014, methodology): “…taxa richness and fish species richness were chosen as indices based on their statistically strong association with the disturbance gradient in this study region (Bunn et al. 2010) and because they are generally sensitive to multiple stressors (e.g. Statzner & Bêche 2010; Stendera et al. 2012).”
• A scientometric assessment of 30 years of the Index of Biotic Integrity in aquatic ecosystems: Applications and main flaws (2013, background): “Tools are needed to support decision-making, thus helping to develop measures that ensure restoration (Niemi and McDonald, 2004; Statzner and Bêche, 2010).”
• Linking biotopes to invertebrates in rivers: Biological traits, taxonomic composition and diversity (2012, background): “In Europe, these could be used by regulatory agencies to assess achievement of ‘Good Ecological Status’ under the European Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC).”