Cryptic Biodiversity in Streams: A Comparison of Macroinvertebrate Communities Based on Morphological and DNA Barcode Identifications

By J. Jackson, J. Battle, B. P. White, E. Pilgrim, E. Stein, P. Miller, B. W. Sweeney. Freshwater Science, 2014

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/32d39a664b7ad9576ec974805e279fa895ec1973

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Florian Leese
2. Vasco Elbrecht
3. Mehrdad Hajibabaei
4. J. Gibson
5. S. Shokralla
6. Paul D. N. Hebert
7. M. Cristescu

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Florian Leese
2. Vasco Elbrecht

Citations in the corpus

• Can DNA-Based Ecosystem Assessments Quantify Species Abundance? Testing Primer Bias and Biomass—Sequence Relationships with an Innovative Metabarcoding Protocol (2015, background): “, [14,25,33]); yet, reliable and standardised laboratory protocols need to be established prior to integrating metabarcoding assessments into existing monitoring programs.”
• Identifying North American freshwater invertebrates using DNA barcodes: are existing COI sequence libraries fit for purpose? (2018, background): “For example, an interspecies COI sequence difference of 2% is consistent for most invertebrate groups (Jackson et al. 2014, White et al. 2014), but can be as high as 10% for groups, such as Oligochaeta (Vivien et al. 2015).”