Applying item response theory modelling for evaluating questionnaire item and scale properties

By B. Reeve, P. Fayers. 2005

256 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/28ca8beab923d529841c29d78803a601ff4683e1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. S. Reise
2. D. Cella
3. B. Reeve
4. Michael D. Toland
5. Karon Cook
6. R. Hays
7. Jakob Bjorner
8. Paul K. Crane

Citations in the corpus

• Measuring thirty facets of the Five Factor Model with a 120-item public domain inventory: Development of the IPIP-NEO-120 (2014, background): “That is, it is assumed that one underlying factor accounts for a person’s response to an item (Morizot et al., 2007; Reeve & Fayers, 2005).”
• Psychometric Evaluation and Calibration of Health-Related Quality of Life Item Banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) (2007, methodology): “The psychometric properties of the items will be examined by review of their item parameter estimates, CRCs, and item information curves.(55,56) Information curves indicate the range of where an item is best at discriminating among individuals.”
• Patient-reported outcomes: A new era in clinical research (2011, background): “It may be used to verify the degree to which scoring and summing is justifiable in the collected data and how well the information fit in the model.[25] Construct validity It is defined as evidence that relationships among concepts, domains and items conform to a priori hypotheses concerning logical”
• Practical Guide to Conducting an Item Response Theory Analysis (2014, background): “Email: toland.md@uky.edu Toland 121 item writing experts, and psychometricians or measurement experts (Reeve & Fayers, 2005).”
• Using psychometric techniques to improve the Balance Evaluation System’s Test: the mini-BESTest (2010, unknown): “In this framework, it is possible to evaluate how well an item performs in terms of its relevance or contribution for measuring the underlying construct, the level of the underlying construct targeted by the question, the possible redundancy of the item relative to other items in the scale, and the ”