The convergence of TD(λ) for general λ
By Peter S. Dayan. 1992
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Sergey Levine
- J. Urgen Schmidhuber
- Yoshua Bengio
- Pieter Abbeel
- Richard S. Sutton
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
- Yuxi Li
- Trevor Darrell
Citations in the corpus
- RUDDER: Return Decomposition for Delayed Rewards (2018, background): “Q-learning [140] is an off-policy TD algorithm which is proved to converge [141, 20].”
- An Emphatic Approach to the Problem of Off-policy Temporal-Difference Learning (2015, methodology): “Watkins (1989) extended TD learning to control in the form of Q-learning and proved its convergence in the tabular case (without function approximation, Watkins & Dayan 1992), while Rummery (1995) extended TD learning to control in an on-policy form as the Sarsa(λ) algorithm.”
- Reinforcement Learning with Replacing Eligibility Traces (2005, methodology): “Although this algorithm is indeed identical to TD( ), the theoretical results for TD( ) onstationary prediction problems (e.g., Sutton, 1988; Dayan, 1992) do not apply here becausethe policy is continually changing, creating a nonstationary prediction problem.7.”
- A Tour of Reinforcement Learning: The View from Continuous Control (2018, methodology): “In particular, Temporal Difference algorithms are derived from the value-function-centric perspective [75, 26, 21, 13, 89].”
- Practical Issues in Temporal Difference Learning (1991, background): “This proof has recently been extended to arbitrary values of), in Dayan (1992).”
- Convergence Results for Single-Step On-Policy Reinforcement-Learning Algorithms (2000, background): “Keywords: reinforcement-learning, on-policy, convergence, Markov decision processes”
- Analytical Mean Squared Error Curves for Temporal Difference Learning (1996, methodology): “The following summary hypotheses for TD algorithms can be formulated from the data shown in Figures 7 and 8: H1 For a fixed Markov reward process and a constant λ, increasing α has two general effects on the learning curve: there is a largest value of α below which the bias converges to zero and abo”
- True Online Temporal-Difference Learning (2015, background): “The error for accumulate TD( λ ) converges to the least mean squares (LMS) error for λ = 1, as predicted by the theory (Dayan, 1992).”
- Neuromodulated Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity, and Theory of Three-Factor Learning Rules (2016, background): “(11) If the estimated state values are updated using the information contained in δTD, the estimated state values will eventually converge to the true solution (Dayan, 1992).”
- Online Transfer Learning in Reinforcement Learning Domains (2015, methodology): “In this case, the convergence of Q-learning, Sarsa, and other related algorithms (such as TD( λ )) have been shown by previous work Peter (1992); Watkins and Dayan (1992); Singh et al. (2000).”
- Self-improving reactive agents based on reinforcement learning, planning and teaching (1992, background): “2. See (Lin, 1991c); Watkins, 1989; Dayan, 1992 ) for using TD(X), k > 0. 3. For simplicity, I will assume the world is deterministic throughout the discussion of the learning algorithms, although it is straightforward to extend the discussion to handle nondeterministic worlds (Barto et al., 1990; ”
- Reinforcement learning for closed-loop propofol anesthesia: a study in human volunteers (2014, methodology): “Q-learning is mathematically robust (Tsitsiklas and Van Roy, 1996; Dayan, 1992), and this robustness has contributed to the method's popularity in applied reinforcement learning.”
- TD(λ) Converges with Probability 1 (1994, methodology): “That the simplest form of TD converges with probability one in a very special case was shown by Dayan (1992) .”
- Reinforcement Learning: A Tutorial Survey and Recent Advances (2009, background): “Several other papers (Gordon, 1995; Hauskrecht, 2000; Dayan, 1992; Tsitsiklis and van Roy, 1996) discuss the issue of function approximation.”