The contrasting roles of government in the development of biotechnology industry in the US and Germany

By S. Giesecke. 2000

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Molecular Biology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/28b16c69be38f8ed1787f8fed6b4805bed2546e7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Mike Wright
2. Donald S. Siegel
3. Martin Kenney
4. David B. Audretsch
5. Erkko Autio
6. Philippe Mustar
7. Maksim Belitski
8. Philip Cooke

In Molecular Biology

1. Philip Cooke

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Donald S. Siegel
2. Mike Wright
3. Martin Kenney
4. Philip Cooke
5. Erkko Autio
6. Dirk De Clercq
7. Dimo Dimov

Citations in the corpus

• Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context (2014, background): “For example, during the last 30 years the German government has pursued policies to foster the development of a biotechnology industry and technological context (Jasanoff, 1985; Giesecke, 2000; Dohse, 2000).”
• NEW ECONOMY INNOVATION SYSTEMS: BIOTECHNOLOGY IN EUROPE AND THE USA (2001, background): “…contest (Dohse 2000), it could be said that, almost in spite of Germany’s corporatist political culture, close co-operation and clear communication channels between government, industry and academia were severely hampered and to some considerable extent, non-existent (Giesecke 1998).”