ESTIMATING POPULATION TREND AND PROCESS VARIATION FOR PVA IN THE PRESENCE OF SAMPLING ERROR

By David F. Staples, Mark L. Taper, Brian Dennis. 2004

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/28a1d013abc8cb2236171694bf1312364da046b7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. N. Dulvy
2. S. Jennings
3. A. Grant
4. J. Reynolds
5. N. B. Goodwin
6. Mark L. Taper
7. José Miguel Ponciano
8. Subhash R. Lele

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. S. Jennings
2. N. Dulvy
3. J. Reynolds
4. A. Grant
5. N. B. Goodwin
6. Mark L. Taper
7. José Miguel Ponciano
8. Subhash R. Lele

Citations in the corpus

• Comparison of threat and exploitation status in North‐East Atlantic marine populations (2005, background): “Further analyses might explore the effects of model and process errors and incorporate age structure and a range of density-dependent possibilities ( Staples, Taper & Dennis 2004 ).”
• ESTIMATING DENSITY DEPENDENCE, PROCESS NOISE, AND OBSERVATION ERROR (2006, methodology): “Staples et al. (2004) subsequently demonstrated that improved estimation for the model can be attained with restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimates based on second differences of the time series data; the model for the first differences, it turns out, can be written as a standard analysis of…”