Why do we need so many chemical similarity search methods?
By Robert P. Sheridan, S. Kearsley. Drug Discovery Today, 2002
374 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/28820bb765ab8c2d0a73a1c6bedd7b09709326af
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- David Ryan Koes
- Brian K. Shoichet
- John J. Irwin
- Sereina Riniker
- Gregory A. Landrum
- Carlos J. Camacho
- Bryan L. Roth
- Mathias Dunkel
In Molecular Biology
- David Ryan Koes
- Brian K. Shoichet
- John J. Irwin
- Bryan L. Roth
- Wenbo Yu
- Sereina Riniker
- Gregory A. Landrum
- Carlos J. Camacho
Citations in the corpus
- Relating protein pharmacology by ligand chemistry (2007, background): “This attests to the MDDR's known false-negative proble”
- Open-source platform to benchmark fingerprints for ligand-based virtual screening (2013, background): “However, the choice of molecular description to calculate the similarity is not trivial and can vary depending on the compound selection and/or target [5-7].”
- Computer-Aided Drug Design Methods (2017, methodology): “Of these, the similarity search method is the most straightforward and rapid approach (87).”
- ZINCPharmer: pharmacophore search of the ZINC database (2012, background): “Fingerprints are well suited for similarity metrics (11), but, since they discretize the pharmacophore representation, provide inexact results.”
- Molecular similarity analysis in virtual screening: foundations, limitations and novel approaches. (2007, background): “Other questions include why does the relative performance of similarity methods generally depend on compound classes [ 9 ], and why do all methods not succeed (or fail) equally? These questions can be answered by taking into account that the nature of SARs depends on the chosen molecular representat”
- Machine learning methods in chemoinformatics (2014, background): “Sheridan and Kearsley’s review 9 and an article by the Ritchie group 10 are two of the numerous papers discussing the relative merits of two and three-dimensional molecular representations.”
- SuperPred: update on drug classification and target prediction (2014, methodology): “Various 2D methods have been developed to search for similarity between compounds (4).”
- Integration of virtual and high-throughput screening (2002, methodology): “So, in general, parallel application of different VS methods increases the probability of identifying molecules that have desired activit”