Prediction with Gaussian Processes: From Linear Regression to Linear Prediction and Beyond
By Christopher K. I. Williams. 1999
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Yoshua Bengio
- Sergey Levine
- Dacheng Tao
- Trevor Darrell
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
- Quoc V. Le
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Kristen Grauman
Citations in the corpus
- Fastfood: Approximate Kernel Expansions in Loglinear Time (2014, neutral): “See e.g. (Williams, 1998; Neal, 1994; MacKay, 2003) for details.”
- The kernel recursive least-squares algorithm (2004, methodology): “Our method is most closely related to a sparsication method used By Csat o and Opper [6, 7] in the context of learning with Gaussian Processes [13, 42 ].”
- Bayesian Framework for Least-Squares Support Vector Machine Classifiers, Gaussian Processes, and Kernel Fisher Discriminant Analysis (2002, methodology): “24 is equivalent with the gaussian process (GP) formulation (Gibbs, 1997; Neal, 1997; Rasmussen, 1996; Sollich, 2000; Williams, 1998; Williams & Barber, 1998) for regression.”
- Optimized Cutting Plane Algorithm for Large-Scale Risk Minimization (2009, background): “Keywords: risk minimization, linear support vector machine, multi-class classification, binary classification, large-scale learning, parallelization”
- The generalized LASSO (2004, methodology): “SPARSE BAYESIAN KERNEL REGRESSION Applying a Bayesian method to the regression problem requires us to specify a set of probabilistic models of the data, see, e.g., [20].”
- Learning to learn with the informative vector machine (2004, background): “Copyright 2004 by the authors. cluding maximum likelihood estimation and hierarchical Bayesian learning (Williams, 1998).”
- Sparse Bayesian Learning and the Relevance Vector Machine (2001, methodology): “This is a Gaussian process model (Rasmussen, 1996; MacKay, 1998; Williams, 1999): i.”
- Kernels and Regularization on Graphs (2003, background): “, in Gaussian Process estimation, where K is the covariance matrix of a stochastic process [Williams, 1999].”
- Transformations of Gaussian Process Priors (2004, methodology): “In the continuous case output = ∫ Ω system× inputdΩ, m(t) = ∫ K(t, x) y(x) dx (1) which could represent a nonlinear mapping fromx to m.”
- Accelerating evolutionary algorithms with Gaussian process fitness function models (2005, methodology): “Since the ratios of upper to lower bounds are very large, we operate with the log of the hyperparameter values, as proposed by Williams [25].”
- Learning Gaussian processes from multiple tasks (2005, unknown): “The exposition here follows (Williams, 1998).”
- Learning with Kernels: support vector machines, regularization, optimization, and beyond (2001, unknown): “The Kernel Trick — Summary • any algorithm that only depends on dot products can benefit from the kernel trick • this way, we can apply linear methods to vectorial as well as non-vectorial data • think of the kernel as a nonlinear similarity measure • examples of common kernels: Polynomial k(x, x′) ”
- Adaptive Sparseness for Supervised Learning (2003, methodology): “Well known discriminative approaches include linear and generalized linear models, k-nearest neighbor classifiers, tree classifiers [9], feed-forward neural networks [6], support vector machines (SVM), and other kernel-based methods [4], [7], [ 10 ].”
- Advances in Large Margin Classifiers (2000, background): “The similarity is most obvious in regression, where the Support Vector solution is the maximum a posteriori estimate of the corre- sponding Bayesian inference scheme (Williams, 1998).”