Transformations of Gaussian Process Priors
By Roderick Murray-Smith, Barak A. Pearlmutter. 2004
39 citations recorded by the source corpus.
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Neil D. Lawrence
- Michael A. Osborne
- Sergey Levine
- Yoshua Bengio
- Zoubin Ghahramani
- Carl E. Rasmussen
- Marc Peter Deisenroth
- Andrew Gordon Wilson
Citations in the corpus
- Modelling transcriptional regulation using Gaussian Processes (2006, methodology): “Gaussian processes have been used effectively in a number of machine learning and statistical applications [8] (see also [2, 6] for the work that is most closely related to ours).”
- Dynamic systems identification with Gaussian processes (2005, background): “Dynamic systems identification with GPs ‘derivative observations’ taken from local linearizations in [8], and our work on transformations of GPs [20] allows the user to design appropriate filters or to cope with sensor dynamics.”
- Bayesian Gaussian processes for sequential prediction, optimisation and quadrature (2010, background): “7 Derivative and Integral Observations We now highlight a very useful property of a GP [Murray-Smith and Pearlmutter, 2005].”
- Gaussian Process Dynamical Models (2005, background): “” Higher-order features can also be fused together with position information to reduce the Gaussian process prediction variance [15, 9].”
- Gaussian Processes for time-marked time-series data (2012, background): “While other non-parametric Gaussian Processes have been studied (Sampson and Guttorp, 1992; Nott and Dunsmuir, 2002; Schmidt and O’Hagan, 2003; Murray-Smith and Pearlmutter, 2003; Paciorek and Schervish, 2006, 2003), we consider in depth the particular case of causal GPs.”