Testing Binkley's hypothesis about the interaction of individual tree water use efficiency and growth efficiency with dominance patterns in open and close canopy stands
By M. Fernández, J. Gyenge. 2009
52 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/285125c4405b0c55d2f0a12bacda43134421f124
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
- D. Binkley
- P. West
- Jose-Luiz Stape
- Michael G. Ryan
- Otavio Camargo Campoe
- W. Bauerle
- D. Forrester
- C. Giardina
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- D. Binkley
- P. West
- Jose-Luiz Stape
- Michael G. Ryan
- D. Forrester
- C. Giardina
- Hans Pretzsch
- Jürgen Bauhus
Citations in the corpus
- Growing Plantation Forests (2010, background): “Research has continued to test the theory further (Martínez-Vilalta et al. 2007; Bond et al. 2007; Martínez-Vilalta et al. 2007; Mencuccini et al. 2007; Vanderklein et al. 2007; Domec et al. 2008; Nabeshima and Hiura 2008; Sperry et al. 2008; Ambrose et al. 2009; Fernández and Gyenge 2009; Drake et ”
- Explaining growth of individual trees: Light interception and efficiency of light use by Eucalyptus at four sites in Brazil (2010, background): “Fernandez and Gyenge (2009) also emphasized that differences in efficiency of resource use between large and small trees may be important, even when dominance is not strongly developed in a stand.”
- Fertilization and irrigation effects on tree level aboveground net primary production, light interception and light use efficiency in a loblolly pine plantation (2013, background): “Patterns of growth dominance have been less evident for pine plantations (Fernández and Gyenge, 2009; Fernández et al., 2011), with pine plantations showing very low (or absent) growth dominance (meaning the production of a given tree is proportional to its size).”