A critique of avian CHD-based molecular sexing protocols illustrated by a Z-chromosome polymorphism detected in auklets

By D. Dawson, S. Darby, F. Hunter, A. Krupa, I. Jones, T. Burke. 2001

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/27f9bc5df0fa8610e5020838a0fcfaec17fe9606

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. B. Robertson
2. Neil J. Gemmell

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Neil J. Gemmell

Citations in the corpus

• Sex identification in avian species using DNA typing methods (2007, methodology): “For this reason, sex identification using molecular methods has proved to be a valuable tool in wildlife conservation in addition to behaviour studies and breeding programmes (Dawson et al., 2001).”
• PCR-based sexing in conservation biology: Wrong answers from an accurate methodology? (2006, background): “... of sex are clearly mindful of errors given the methodological adjustments that have been suggested to gain greater accuracy in molecular sexing (Griffiths 2000): for example, increasing gel resolution (e.g., Griffiths et al. 1998), repeating amplifications of individual samples (e.g., Whittingha”