PCR-based sexing in conservation biology: Wrong answers from an accurate methodology?

By B. Robertson, Neil J. Gemmell. Conservation Genetics, 2006

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1d89021846acf35306c1a6ac3dab4159c4bfde6d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. F. Dechaume‐Moncharmont
2. Frank Cézilly
3. K. Monceau

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. F. Dechaume‐Moncharmont
2. Frank Cézilly
3. K. Monceau

Citations in the corpus

• Sexing Birds Using Discriminant Function Analysis: A Critical Appraisal (2011, background): “Although the latter methods are by far the most popular techniques and are thought to be very reliable (but see Robertson and Gemmell 2006), they require training and a license to collect blood or tissues, which raises ethical issues, and imply financial costs and delays for processing of samples.”