Batterer Program Participants Who Repeatedly Reassault

By E. Gondolf, Robert J White. 2001

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Do Batterer Subtypes Actually Matter? Treatment Completion, Treatment Response, and Recidivism Across a Batterer Typology (2008, background): “…recidivism were linked to antisocial tendencies, younger age (18 to 25), previous arrests, early drop out from treatment (less than 3 months), history of substance abuse, personality dysfunction, severe violence committed against a partner, and general violence tendencies (Gondolf & White, 2001).”
THEORETICAL AND RESEARCH SUPPORT FOR THE DULUTH MODEL: A REPLY TO DUTTON AND CORVO (2007, background): “What do we do about these particularly problematic men — many of whom have been previously sent to mental health treatment and been involved in the criminal justice system, according to the characteristics of our samples (Gondolf, 1999; Gondolf & White, 2001).”
The weak evidence for batterer program alternatives (2011, background): “In our previous research of the men who drop out and repeatedly reassault their partners, no one psychological or relational profile stood out, and they didn't appear to fit into any of the prescribed categories of the alternative approaches (Gondolf & White 2001).”
Evaluating batterer counseling programs: A difficult task showing some effects and implications (2004, background): “However, their personality profiles did not distinguish them from men who reassaulted only one time, and men who did not reassault (Gondolf & White, 2001).”