Editorial – Introductory remarks on “Discussion & Debate: Rogue Waves – Towards a Unifying Concept?”

226 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Dragon-kings: Mechanisms, statistical methods and empirical evidence (2012, background): “We refer to Heller (2005) and in particular to Akhmediev and Pelinovsky (2010).”
Instabilities, breathers and rogue waves in optics (2014, result): “t among them (which make up only 0.1% of the total) do have intensities exceeding the rogue wave threshold I RW and would very clearly be described as rogue wave events according to any criteria used [2,51]. Note that the figures below the histogram in Fig. 2(c) show simulation results comparing a t”