Your own children are special: clues to the sources of reporting bias in temperament assessments

By R. Seifer, A. Sameroff, S. Dickstein, Masha Schiller, L. Hayden. 2004

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/27d7712c45085d91a04e7d0a2bec60a7e9012471

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Andrea Klassen
2. M. Holder
3. J. Bates
4. M. Zentner

In Clinical Psychology

1. Andrea Klassen
2. M. Holder
3. J. Bates
4. Jean-Pascal Lemelin
5. M. Zentner
6. M. Provost
7. George M. Tarabulsy

In Social Psychology

1. Andrea Klassen
2. M. Holder
3. J. Bates
4. M. Zentner
5. M. Provost
6. George M. Tarabulsy

Citations in the corpus

• Temperament and Happiness in Children (2010, background): “In addition, although parents may have the most information about their children’s behavior across time and situations, they cannot know exactly what children’s internal processes are ( Seifer et al. 2004 ).”
• Predicting Preschool Cognitive Development from Infant Temperament, Maternal Sensitivity, and Psychosocial Risk (2006, background): “While temperament research has long relied on such reports to develop knowledge and theory concerning infant emotions, their validity and reliability has historically (Vaughn, Bradley, Joffe, Seifer, & Barglow, 1987) and recently ( Seifer, Sameroff, Dickstein, Schiller, & Hayden, 2004 ) been questio”
• Child Temperament: An Integrative Review of Concepts, Research Programs, and Measures (2008, background): “Thus, the ratings of professionals are less likely to be affected by anxieties and hopes that many parents have for their child (Seifer et al., 2004).”