Modern regional innovation policy

By Philip McCann, R. Ortega-Argilés. 2013

274 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/279800f88275a9917d2b0765922fc0bf6553d0eb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Nurturing novelty: Regional innovation policy in the age of smart specialisation (2017, background): “…can learn a great deal from the insights of the new industrial policy (NIP) literature, where the state has been rehabilitated as an economic actor and enjoined to work in and through networks to catalyse innovation and development (Rodrik, 2004; McCann and Ortega-Argiles, 2013; Foray, 2014).”
A review of (almost) 20 years of regional innovation systems research (2017, background): “…a significant number of public policies have been developed to promote regional economic growth by stimulating innovation processes and networks (McCann & Ortega-Argilés, 2013) between businesses; knowledge organizations such as universities, laboratories and institutes and technology transfer…”
Smart specialisation, entrepreneurship and SMEs: issues and challenges for a results-oriented EU regional policy (2016, background): “…regional and urban policy reforms, the emergence of smart specialisation as a policy prioritisation framework is by now well documented (Foray 2015: McCann and Ortega-Argilés 2013a, b, 2015a; McCann 2015), and importantly for our purposes here, this approach also brings entrepreneurship and SMEs…”
From productive interactions to impact pathways: Understanding the key dimensions in developing SSH research societal impact (2019, background): “D epartm ent of H ealth Sciences user on 28 January 2020 indicators advocated by a number of multi-organizations including the OECD, World Bank and European Commission (McCann and Ortega-Argiles 2013).”
Same difference? Minority ethnic inventors, diversity and innovation in the UK (2015, background): “long-term economic growth, and European policymakers are actively seeking to upgrade national innovation systems (McCann and Ortega-Arguilés, 2013).”
Six critical questions about smart specialization (2019, background): “Regional innovation polices have developed strongly in large parts of Europe and other industrialized countries since the mid-1980s (McCann & Ortega-Argilés, 2013; OECD, 2011).”
Smart Specialization, Regional Growth and Applications to European Union Cohesion Policy (2015, background): “Smart specialization as a policy-prioritization logic builds on the existing regional innovation systems literature (MCCANN and ORTEGA-ARGILÉS, 2013), and many of the leading scholars in the innovation systems field have been involved in these aspects of the EU cohesion policy reforms.”
The “Smart Village” as a Way to Achieve Sustainable Development in Rural Areas of Poland (2020, background): “They are characterized by restricted potential of innovative processes and a lower rate of innovative activity compared to core areas [58,59].”