Auditing to Keep Online Storage Services Honest

By Mehul A. Shah, Mary G. Baker, Jeffrey C. Mogul, Ram Swaminathan. USENIX Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems, 2007

432 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/277a2794d9ea67cc0657b019c2e77faa3b37eddf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Provable data possession at untrusted stores (2007, methodology): “[42] use a similar technique for third-party auditing of data stored at online service providers and put forth some of the challenges associated with auditing online storage services.”
Ensuring data storage security in Cloud Computing (2009, background): “[17] proposed allowing a TPA to keep online storage hones t by first encrypting the data then sending a number of precomputed symmetric-keyed hashes over the encrypted data to the auditor.”
A Privacy-Preserving Remote Data Integrity Checking Protocol with Data Dynamics and Public Verifiability (2011, methodology): “[12] propose a remote storage auditing method based on precomputed challenge-response pairs.”
Privacy-Preserving Public Auditing for Data Storage Security in Cloud Computing (2010, background): “From the perspective of protecting data privacy, the users, who own the data and rely on TPA just for the storage security of their data, do not want this auditing process introducing new vulnerabilities of unauthorized information leakage towards their data security [12].”
An Efficient and Secure Dynamic Auditing Protocol for Data Storage in Cloud Computing (2013, background): “The analysis and simulation results show that our proposed auditing protocols are secure and efficient, especially it reduce the computation cost of the auditor.”
Depot: Cloud Storage with Minimal Trust (2010, methodology): “A related strand of work focuses on accountability and auditing (see [38, 58, 62, 74]), providing proofs to participants if other participants misbehave.”
HAIL: a high-availability and integrity layer for cloud storage (2009, background): “Earlier closely related constructions to PORs and PDPs include [15, 33, 27].”
Dynamic Data Operations with Deduplication in Privacy-Preserving Public Auditing for Secure Cloud Storage (2017, unknown): “[27] first introduce third-party auditor (TPA).”
Compact Proofs of Retrievability (2008, background): “argue [30], is storage auditing: cryptographic systems that would allow users of outsourced storage services (or their agents) to verify that their data is still available and ready for retrieval if needed.”
Proofs of retrievability: theory and implementation (2009, background): “While communication efficient, this scheme is impractical, as respond requires computation of a modular exponentiation with respect to a bit-representation of all of F . Shah et al. [ 23 ] consider a symmetric-key variant of full-file processing to enable external audits of file possession.”
MR-PDP: Multiple-Replica Provable Data Possession (2008, background): “Both types of protocols are vulnerable to collusion attacks in which multiple servers that appear to be storing multiple replicas are in fact storing only a single copy of the data.”
Toward publicly auditable secure cloud data storage services (2010, background): “In fact, based on the audit result from a TPA, the released audit report would not only help owners to evaluate the risk of their subscribed cloud data services, but also be beneficial for the cloud service provider to improve their cloud based service platform [8].”