Clothing and embodiment: men managing body image and appearance

By H. Frith, K. Gleeson. 2004

603 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Museology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/27786b0f192633ca9a9568f118e6ab7b79f33f41

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Mohammed Ibrahim
2. Victoria Clarke
3. Katherine A. Karl
4. Joy Peluchette

In Gender Studies

1. Mohammed Ibrahim
2. Victoria Clarke

In Museology

1. Mohammed Ibrahim
2. Victoria Clarke

Citations in the corpus

• DRESSING TO IMPRESS: BELIEFS AND ATTITUDES REGARDING WORKPLACE ATTIRE (2006, background): “While there is theoretical support for the argument that individuals use clothing as part of how they construct their image in the workplace ( Frith & Gleeson, 2004; Goffman, 1959; Rafaeli & Pratt, 1993; Trice & Beyer, 1993), research has focused almost solely on how attire is perceived by others.”
• THEMATIC ANALYSIS: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF ITS PROCESS AND EVALUATION (2012, methodology): “More importantly it provides the flexibility for approaching research patterns in two ways, i.e. inductive and deductive (Frith and Gleeson 2004; Hayes 2000; Halldorson 2009).”
• V. Clothes Maketh the Queer? Dress, Appearance and the Construction of Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Identities (2007, background): “Although dress and appearance are often seen as trivial and unworthy of academic attention (Frith and Gleeson, 2004), it is clear from this and other studies that they are an important part of the everyday realities of (at least some) lesbians, gay men and bisexuals, and of the performativity of…”