Black holes on FIRE: stellar feedback limits early feeding of galactic nuclei

By Daniel Anglés-Alcázar, C. Faucher-Giguére, E. Quataert, P. Hopkins, Robert Feldmann, P. Torrey, Andrew Wetzel, Duvsan Kerevs Northwestern, Uc Berkeley, Caltech and 5 more. 2017

165 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We introduce massive black holes (BHs) in the Feedback In Realistic Environments (FIRE) project and perform high-resolution cosmological hydrodynamic simulations of quasar-mass haloes [Mhalo(z = 2) ≈ 1012.5 M⊙] down to z = 1. These simulations model stellar feedback by supernovae, stellar winds and radiation, and BH growth using a gravitational torque-based prescription tied to the resolved properties of galactic nuclei. We do not include BH feedback. We show that early BH growth occurs through short (≲1 Myr) accretion episodes that can reach or even exceed the Eddington rate. In this regime, BH growth is limited by bursty stellar feedback continuously evacuating gas from galactic nuclei, and BHs remain undermassive in low-mass galaxies relative to the local MBH–Mbulgerelation. BH growth is more efficient at later times, when the nuclear stellar potential retains a significant gas reservoir, star formation becomes less bursty and galaxies settle into a more ordered state. BHs rapidly converge on to the observed scaling relations when the host reaches Mbulge ∼ 1010 M⊙. We show that resolving the effects of stellar feedback on the gas supply in the inner ∼100 pc of galaxies is necessary to accurately capture the growth of central BHs. Our simulations imply that bursty stellar feedback has important implications for BH–galaxy relations, AGN demographics and time variability, the formation of early quasars and massive BH mergers.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/276d2ce616a211d964beeedc7a90aaf19c4f1d84

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. Volker Springel
  4. C. Faucher-Giguére
  5. E. Quataert
  6. P. Torrey
  7. D. Keres̆
  8. M. Vogelsberger

In Instrumentation

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. Volker Springel
  4. M. Vogelsberger
  5. P. Torrey
  6. R. Dav'e
  7. Shy Genel
  8. C. Faucher-Giguére

Citations in the corpus