Alternative management technologies for postharvest disease control: The journey from simplicity to complexity

270 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Volatile organic compounds produced by Antarctic strains of Candida sake play a role in the control of postharvest pathogens of apples. (2017, background): “In this regard, biological control has received considerable attention as a potential alternative (Wisniewski et al., 2016; Droby et al., 2016; Vero et al., 2009).”
Biological Control of Plant Pathogens: A Global Perspective (2022, background): “In many circumstances, toxicological studies do not exist or are too expensive and time-consuming for local manufacturers [168,197].”
Postharvest Treatments with GRAS Salts to Control Fresh Fruit Decay (2018, unknown): “If conventional chemicals are not available, effective control will need to adopt integrated strategies in which, besides new nonpolluting postharvest antifungal treatments, all factors affecting disease epidemiology and incidence will need to be taken into account, including preharvest factors [19,”
Metabarcoding: A powerful tool to investigate microbial communities and shape future plant protection strategies (2017, background): “…clear that metabarcoding technologies represent a powerful way to identify the microflora associated with plants, and can be used to better understand complex plantmicrobiota interactions, including those involving pathogenic and beneficial species (Massart et al., 2015; Wisniewski et al., 2016a).”