DELINQUENT PEERS IN CONTEXT: A LONGITUDINAL NETWORK ANALYSIS OF SELECTION AND INFLUENCE EFFECTS*

By Frank M. Weerman. 2011

216 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/273ca2bcf362d5446c02769e1469503210be0b80

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. René Veenstra
2. Jan Kornelis Dijkstra
3. Maarten van Zalk
4. Christian E. G. Steglich

In General Health Professions

1. Christian E. G. Steglich

In Sociology and Political Science

1. René Veenstra
2. Jan Kornelis Dijkstra
3. Christian E. G. Steglich

Citations in the corpus

• Network–Behavior Dynamics (2013, background): “These studies revealed that the influence effect on delinquency was found in studies that looked at the effects of peers in the same grade or town, and not of classmates (Dijkstra, Gest, Lindenberg, Veenstra, & Cillessen, 2012; Svensson, Burk, Stattin, & Kerr, 2012; Weerman, 2011).”
• Peers and delinquency among girls and boys: Are sex differences in delinquency explained by peer factors? (2012, unknown): “Analysis of this issue would require specialized social network analysis that goes beyond the scope of this article (see, for example, Weerman, 2011).”