The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework
By R. Kasperson, Ortwin Renn, Paul Slovic, Halina Szejnwald Brown, J. Emel, R. Goble, J. Kasperson, S. Ratick. 1988
Subfields: Social Sciences & Humanities
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Sciences & Humanities
- S. van der Linden
- R. Gifford
- Stuart Soroka
- L. Steg
- Verena Rieser
- Gavin Abercrombie
- Dirk Hovy
- A. S. Bergman
Citations in the corpus
- Anticipating Safety Issues in E2E Conversational AI: Framework and Tooling (2021, background): “People are highly influenced by social dynamics and group membership in ways that create artificial amplification effects (Kasperson et al., 1988; Slovic, 1993; 1999).”
- The Risk Perception Paradox—Implications for Governance and Communication of Natural Hazards (2013, background): “Indirect experience includes education, media, and hazard witnesses.(39,42,43) Several authors have collected factors correlated with hearing risk warnings, understanding warnings, and believing warnings.”
- The Nasty Effect: Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies (2014, background): “Taken together, these perspectives suggest that social, political, and environmental factors, in addition to individual factors such as cognition levels, can contribute to variation in risk perceptions (Kasperson et al., 1988).”
- Risk perception and the media (2000, unknown): “The only large-scale framework so far for understanding risk perception was proposed by Kasperson et al. (1988).”