The Muted Consequences of Correct Information about Immigration

By Daniel Hopkins, J. Sides, J. Citrin. Journal of Politics, 2019

267 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Previous research shows that people commonly exaggerate the size of minority populations. Theories of intergroup threat predict that the larger people perceive minority groups to be, the less favorably they feel toward them. We investigate whether correcting Americans’ misperceptions about one such population—immigrants—affects related attitudes. We confirm that non-Hispanic Americans overestimate the percentage of the population that is foreign-born or in the United States without authorization. However, in seven separate survey experiments over 11 years, we find that providing accurate information does little to affect attitudes toward immigration, even though it does reduce the perceived size of the foreign-born population. This is true even when people’s misperceptions are explicitly corrected. These results call into question a potential cognitive mechanism that could underpin intergroup threat theory. Misperceptions about the size of minority groups may be a consequence, rather than a cause, of attitudes toward those groups.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/271e92ec3061733d5f767bb13ca45b637b6070d6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

  1. Ingar K. Haaland
  2. Johannes Wohlfart
  3. Christopher Roth
  4. Brendan Nyhan
  5. S. Jayachandran
  6. Emily K. Vraga
  7. Brian E. Weeks

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Johannes Wohlfart
  2. Christopher Roth
  3. Ingar K. Haaland
  4. Tarun Jain
  5. Brendan Nyhan
  6. Diva Dhar
  7. S. Jayachandran
  8. Ritam Chaurey

Citations in the corpus