Effects of air quality regulation on the destination choice of relocating plants

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Competitiveness (2017, background): “…relative to an “attainment” county, being a strictly regulated “nonattainment” county decreases the inflow of relocating plants by nearly 63 percent (List et al. 2003) and decreases the expected inflow of new dirty plants by 44–61 percent or 150–600 percent, depending on the estimator used…”
The Case of the Missing Pollution Haven Hypothesis (2004, methodology): “However, as noted in List et al. (2003), it is weaker than the identifying assumptions utilized in the past (e.g., Henderson (1996) assumes ozone attainment status is strictly exogenous conditional on a subset of the attributes in Z0).”
Environmental Regulations, Outward FDI and Heterogeneous Firms: Are Countries Used as Pollution Havens? (2012, background): “S. countries, Waldkirch 1Related to this literature are studies which do not explicitly consider FDI but rather the relocation patterns of plants within the U.S., such as Levinson (1996), Henderson (1996) and List et al. (2003).”
Environmental Regulation and French Firms Location Abroad: An Economic Geography Model in an International Comparative Study (2012, unknown): “Similarly, empirical results of List et al. (2003a) from models using both parametric and semi-nonparametric specifications on U.S. county level panel data show that air quality regulations influence the destination choice of relocating plants.”