Payment Certainty in Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Responses: Results from a Field Validity Test

By Christian A. Vossler, Robert G. Ethier, Gregory L. Poe, Michael P. Welsh. 2003

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2662a4f41692e3117efc814aaae6c159e593dba9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Transportation

Citations in the corpus

Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Macro-scale analysis of literature and effectiveness of bias mitigation methods (2021, result): “Similar promising findings were reported for other CV methods (Blumenschein et al., 2007; Harrison and Rutström, 2008), including referendums (Morrison and Brown, 2009), dichotomous choice experiments (Brouwer, 2011; Vossler et al., 2003) and auctions (Furno et al., 2019).”
Using Respondent Uncertainty to Mitigate Hypothetical Bias in a Stated Choice Experiment (2010, background): “…that best mitigates hypothetical bias is at the very the top of the certainty scale (Blomquist, Blumenschein, and Johannesson 2008; Champ et al. 1997), others have found that a somewhat lower threshold works best (Champ and Bishop 2001; Ethier et al. 2000; Vossler et al. 2003; Poe et al. 2002).”
Eliciting Willingness to Pay Without Bias: Evidence from a Field Experiment (2008, unknown): “Similar results using a certainty scale were also found by Ethier et al. (2000), Champ and Bishop (2001), Poe et al. (2002) and Vossler et al. (2003).2 A drawback of using a scale to assess certainty is that it is necessary to estimate the cut-off level of certainty at which a hypothetical decision…”
Eliciting Willingness to Pay without Bias using Follow-up Certainty Statements: Comparisons between Probably/Definitely and a 10-point Certainty Scale (2009, unknown): “For example, Vossler et al. (2003) present to the individual a two-dimensional matrix with several dollar amounts (prices or bids) and several levels of certainty at each price.”
Willingness to pay for a Green Energy program: A comparison of ex-ante and ex-post hypothetical bias mitigation approaches (2007, unknown): “Poe et al. (2002) and Vossler et al. (2003) find that those respondents who are certain of their willingness to pay at the 7 or higher level on a 10 point scale have similar probabilities of payment as a real willingness to pay sample.”