Americans' Talk to Dogs: Similarities and Differences With Talk to Infants

By Robert W. Mitchell. 2001

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/265c3420f88c622ca387f8a3bc45dc4cd0946c6b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Olga Solomon
2. Melanie Soderstrom
3. Á. Miklósi
4. Enikö Kubinyi

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Olga Solomon
2. Melanie Soderstrom
3. Á. Miklósi
4. Enikö Kubinyi

In Language and Linguistics

1. Olga Solomon
2. Melanie Soderstrom
3. Á. Miklósi
4. Enikö Kubinyi

Citations in the corpus

• The dog as a model for understanding human social behavior (2009, unknown): “, 2006) including verbal communication, such as the use of ‘‘motherese’’ and ‘‘doggerel,’’ respectively (see Hirsch‐Pasek and Treiman, 1981; Mitchell, 2001).”
• What a Dog Can Do: Children with Autism and Therapy Dogs in Social Interaction (2010, background): “…it expands the notion of sociality to include human beings with and without developmental disorders (see also Ochs and Solomon 2004, this issue; and Ochs et al. 2005), and suggests that sociality is not a quality of an individual but a capacity realized through certain kinds of social interaction.”
• Beyond babytalk: Re-evaluating the nature and content of speech input to preverbal infants (2007, background): “Mitchell, R. W. (2001). Americans’ talk with dogs: Similarities and differences with talk to infants.”
• Comparative social cognition: From wolf and dog to humans (2006, background): “Some data suggest that there is a close similarity between how humans interact with young infants and with dogs (Mitchell, 2001).”