Vigilance behaviour of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in the context of wildlife-viewing activities at Churchill, Manitoba, Canada
By M. Dyck, R. Baydack. 2004
119 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/26151ea0bd9927aec198cd5f809ec06038dc88ae
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental Biology
- David Lusseau
- L. Bejder
- D. Noren
- F. Christiansen
- Hal Whitehead
- Karen A. Stockin
- Rob Williams
- Andrew Sih
In Ecology
- David Lusseau
- L. Bejder
- Hal Whitehead
- F. Christiansen
- D. Noren
- Karen A. Stockin
- M. Ferrari
- Zhigang Jiang
Citations in the corpus
- Ultimate and proximate mechanisms underlying the occurrence of bears close to human settlements: review and management implications (2014, unknown): “Male polar bears Ursus maritimus also show increased vigilance towards viewing tourists, whereas females respond in the opposite manner, by increasing vigilance when people are not present (Dyck & Baydack 2004).”
- Flock size and human disturbance affect vigilance of endangered red-crowned cranes (Grus japonensis) (2011, background): “, 2000), at given group sizes (Yasue, 2005), for one sex (Dyck and Baydack, 2004) or in particular years (Burger and Gochfeld, 1991).”
- Ship noise and cortisol secretion in European freshwater fishes (2006, background): “…on physiology, behavior, acoustic communication and reproductive success of terrestrial animals (e.g., Reijnen et al., 1996; Gibeau et al., 2002; Dyck and Baydack, 2004; Sun and Narins, 2005) and marine mammals (Richardson et al., 1985, 1995; Myrberg, 1990; Le-sage et al., 1999; Nowacek et al.,…”
- Evolution and behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change (2011, background): “Examples include numerous species probably over-avoiding habitats used by humans, including areas used for eco-tourism and human recreation (Brown and Stevens 1997; Gander and Ingold 1997; Dyck and Baydack 2004; Gilroy and Sutherland 2007; Andersen and Aaars 2008).”
- Meta-analyses of whale-watching impact studies: Comparisons of cetacean responses to disturbance (2016, background): “Human recreational activities can induce behavioral and physiological changes in animal populations (Dyck & Baydack 2004).”
- Consequences of brown bear viewing tourism : A review (2017, background): “For example, bears constrained to 197 using resources close to viewing sites may exhibit increased vigilance (Braaten and 198 Gilbert, 1987; see also Dycka and Baydack, 2004 and Andersen and Aars, 2005 for polar 199 bears Ursus maritimus) and a reduction in time devoted to behaviours potentially…”
- Impact assessment research: use and misuse of habituation, sensitisation and tolerance in describing wildlife responses to anthropogenic stimuli (2009, background): “Thirdly, animals may have no other option but to stay if disturbances are concentrated in a critical habitat (e.g. an obligate breeding site), again regardless of the possible long-term consequences (Gill et al. 2001, Creel et al. 2002, Dyck & Baydack 2004).”