Cities, Agglomeration And Spatial Equilibrium

By Edward L. Glaeser. 2008

458 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/25f214d69bc52d0970617b70e275057e687f1237

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

New Economic Geography: An appraisal on the occasion of Paul Krugman's 2008 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences☆ (2009, background): “…economic agglomerations as well as regional specialization and spatial inequalities, then the Spatial Impossibility Theorem tells us that we must make at least one of the following three assumptions: 1 A rich overview of more recent developments in urban economics is provided by Glaeser (2008).”
Regional inequality in Europe: evidence, theory and policy implications (2019, unknown): “In the standard neo-classical formulation, concentration costs naturally generate the de-agglomeration forces necessary to even out the landscape of development, in either real incomes or total utility terms (Glaeser, 2008).”
Rebalancing the Spatial Economy: The Challenge for Regional Theory (2015, background): “…that accrue from the density of activity and population within cities: density is alleged to increase interaction, spillovers, market opportunities, productivity and wages (GLAESER et al., 1992; FUJITA and THISSE, 2002; HENDERSON, 2003; GLAESER, 2008, 2009, 2012; GLAESER and GOTTLIEB, 2009).”
The Complementarity between Cities and Skills (2009, unknown): “If workers are to be indifferent across locations, which is a necessary condition for the existence of a spatial equilibrium (Glaeser, 2008), then high costs of living must offset high wages.”
Housing, urban growth and inequalities: The limits to deregulation and upzoning in reducing economic and spatial inequality (2019, background): “The basic set-up here derives from spatial equilibrium theory, which holds that city size and population growth are the only important factors for economic growth, because once the conditions are in place for population growth, jobs and output growth will follow (Glaeser, 2008).”
Spatial Period-Doubling Agglomeration of a Core-Periphery Model with a System of Cities (2009, background): “…and Puga (1998) [24], in a review by Fujita and Thisse (2009) [12], and in several books as follows: Fujita et al. (1999) [10], Brakman et al., 2001 [3], Fujita and Thisse (2002) [11], Baldwin et al. (2003) [1], Henderson and Thisse (2004) [15], Combes et al. (2008) [4], and Glaeser (2008) [13].”
Separate Worlds? Explaining the current wave of regional economic polarization (2018, background): “In this context, households choose regions by arbitraging a wide variety of preferences, with the key ones consisting of nominal income, housing type and cost, and a variety of priced and unpriced amenities, and the avoidance of dis-amenities (Glaeser, 2008).”
Taxation, corruption, and growth (2016, unknown): “Our work also connects to a literature on the determinants of spatial location (e.g., Marshall 1920, Rosenthal and Strange 2004, Duranton and Puga 2004, Glaeser 2008, Ellison et al. 2010).”
Agglomeration and Innovation (2014, background): “Assuming the zero-profit condition holds, one obtains a relationship between the nominal wage of workers and the aggregate measure of human capital that can be expressed in a Mincerian wage regression: ln ln ln ic c ic ic W H h δ ν ε = + + , where the parameter of interest is δ .”
NEW DIRECTIONS FOR URBAN ECONOMIC MODELS OF LAND USE CHANGE: INCORPORATING SPATIAL DYNAMICS AND HETEROGENEITY (2010, background): “As Glaeser (2008) writes in his book Cities, Agglomeration and Spatial Equilibrium, the spatial equilibrium assumption is the bedrock of urban economics upon which everything else stands.”
Electoral rules and voter turnout (2011, unknown): “…residential choices as motivated by the benefits accruing to mobile households.19 Moreover, Roback-type models of spatial equilibrium (see: Glaeser, 2008) underscore that location-specific factors that positively affect both the productivity of the firms and the welfare of the households…”
Swings in Commercial and Residential Land Prices in the United States (2013, background): “Standard models of spatial equilibrium (see Glaeser, 2008, and Anas, Arnott, and Small, 1998) allocate land to its highest-value use, subject to regulatory constraints.”