Partitioned procedures for the transient solution of coupled aeroelastic problems

By Serge Piperno, Charbel Farhat, B. Larrouturou. 2001

444 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/25dddc3ce693de8114da7303e10b2eef0f3025dc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

Citations in the corpus

Provably second-order time-accurate loosely-coupled solution algorithms for transient nonlinear computational aeroelasticity (2006, background): “…time-integrator that is provably second-order time-accurate on moving grids, the midpoint rule for advancing in time the solution of the structural dynamics equations of motion, a second-order structure predictor for bypassing the inner-iterations encountered in strongly-coupled solution…”
Isogeometric fluid-structure interaction: theory, algorithms, and computations (2008, background): “It seems that “light” structures interacting with “heavy” fluids are particularly problematic (see, e.g., [50, 52 ,53]).”
ACCELERATION OF A FIXED POINT ALGORITHM FOR FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION USING TRANSPIRATION CONDITIONS (2003, unknown): “This strategy is computationally cheap and performs well in many practical situations, for example, in aeroelasticity applications [7, 20, 21].”
Added-mass effect in the design of partitioned algorithms for fluid-structure problems (2005, methodology): “[21, 20, 17, 5, 4, 11, 12]) Although loosely coupled (explicit) algorithms are successfully used in aeroelasticity (see [5] and the references therein), it is common experience in other applications [19, 10, 16] that they feature instabilities under certain choices of the physical parameters, typica”
Fluid-Structure Interaction (2012, unknown): “The most known example is due to (Piperno et al., 1995), who introduced a difference of t / 2 between the structure and fluid state calculations.”
Partitioned Strong Coupling Algorithms for Fluid-Structure-Interaction (2003, background): “Thefore we consider pa titionedmethods [9, 10, 11] — also known asiterativemethods [16, 15, 17] for fluid-structure interaction, i.”
A monolithic approach to fluid–structure interaction (2004, unknown): “In a partitioned method, the ﬂuid and the structure equations are alternatingly integrated in time and the interface conditions are enforced asynchronously; see, e.g., [1–3].”
Modular vs. non-modular preconditioners for fluid-structure systems with large added-mass effect (2008, unknown): “Thus, it is common practice in computational aeroelasticity to use an explicit treatment of the coupling, that is only one coupling iteration is performed per time step (see, e.g., [ 25 , 12]).”
Partitioned but strongly coupled iteration schemes for nonlinear fluid-structure interaction (2002, methodology): “In this paper, we consider partitioned methods [8] for fluid-structure interaction, i.”