Provably second-order time-accurate loosely-coupled solution algorithms for transient nonlinear computational aeroelasticity

420 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Performance of a new partitioned procedure versus a monolithic procedure in fluid-structure interaction (2009, methodology): “in aeroelastic simulations, only one coupling iteration is re quired within each time step [1, 26, 27, 28] but these so-called staggered or loosely-coupled methods d not enforce the equilibrium conditions on the fluid-structu re interface within each time step.”
A convergence study of a new partitioned fluid-structure interaction algorithm based on fictitious mass and damping (2012, methodology): “Partitioned methods can be further classified into weak [14] and strong coupling [15].”
Isogeometric fluid-structure interaction: theory, algorithms, and computations (2008, background): “[18] has reported consistent success for staggered approaches to compressible fluids.”
Numerical Methods for Fluid-Structure Interaction — A Review (2012, methodology): “With better prediction of the interface locations, Farhat et al. (2006) built a FSI method with second-order accuracy in time.”
Aeroelastic and Aerothermoelastic Analysis in Hypersonic Flow: Past, Present, and Future (2011, methodology): “, loosely coupled) second-orderaccurate fluid–structure numerical integration approaches can be constructed, provided 1) the fluid time integrator is second-order time-accurate on moving grids, 2) a second-order time integrator is used as a predictor for structural motion, 3) the algorithm for timei”