DEALING WITH OUTLIERS AND OFFSETS IN RADIOCARBON DATING

569 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Human occupation of northern Australia by 65,000 years ago (2017, methodology): “The measured 14C ages have been calibrated using OxCal program v.4.2 (Bronk Ramsey, 2009a; Bronk Ramsey and Lee, 2013) and the SHCal13 data set (which includes an age offset for the Southern Hemisphere; Hogg et al., 2013), with the age ranges in Supplementary Table 1 expressed at the 95.4%…”
All age–depth models are wrong, but are getting better (2015, background): “Bronk Ramsey (2009) discusses three reasons why outliers may occur and develops different outlier models of varying complexity to detect outliers.”
Revised calendar date for the Taupo eruption derived by 14C wiggle-matching using a New Zealand kauri 14C calibration data set (2012, methodology): “…14 C samples Having derived a new, definitive calendar date for the Taupo eruption [1] of AD 232 ± 5, we used the ‘Combine’ function of OxCal4 (Bronk Ramsey, 2008, 2009) and calibration against the Southern Hemisphere atmospheric curve SHCal04 (McCormac et al., 2004) to reassess the accuracy of…”