All age–depth models are wrong, but are getting better

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Double the dates and go for Bayes — Impacts of model choice, dating density and quality on chronologies (2018, methodology): “However, simulations such as ours do help to360 quantify such uncertainties, and as a community we should ask ourselves361 whether classical age-depth models remain suited to their task (Bennett, 1994;362 Telford et al., 2004; Trachsel and Telford, 2017).”