Corporate Governance and Economic Performance
By Klaus Gugler. 2001
246 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/25822cd178a1679a6dc10b6faec7460900bc7835
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- B. Yurtoglu
- Klaus Gugler
- B. Mashayekhi
- M. Díaz
- Dennis C. Mueller
- Mohammad S. Bazaz
- Rosario Sánchez
- Peter
Citations in the corpus
- Firm size and productivity in Spain: a stochastic frontier analysis (2008, background): “Gugler 2001 ). The discussion focuses on the separation of firms’ ownership and control, under the assumption that owners and managers have different objectives.”
- Governance and Performance Revisited (2004, unknown): “The evidence on owner identity is mixed, and according to Gugler (2001) “remarkably unexplored.”
- Corporate Governance and the Returns on Investment* (2004, background): “10 For examples and discussion, see Gugler (2001).”
- Corporate Governance and Firm Performance in Iran (2008, background): “Based on a comprehensive survey primarily of studies from the US and UK, Gugler concludes that owner-controlled firms tend to significantly outperform manager-controlled firms [ 8 ].”
- Corporate Governance and Innovation: A Survey (2012, unknown): “Adverse incentive effects of debt financing for innovation are described in detail by Gugler (2001), who finds five reasons why debt is poorly suited to technological investment.”
- Corporate Governance and Dividend Pay-out Policy in Germany (2003, background): “3 See the report by the European Corporate Governance Network (ECGN, 1997) and the follow-up studies of Barca and Becht (2001) and Gugler (2001).”
- Corporate governance, dividend payout policy, and the interrelation between dividends, R&D, and capital investment (2003, background): “Gugler (1998) reports that nearly 30% of the employees of the 600 largest non-financial companies in Austria are (still) under state-control, 35% of the employees are governed by families or individuals, foreign firms command 26.1%, and around 10% are under bank-control.”
- Why Adopt Codes of Good Governance? A Comparison of Institutional and Efficiency Perspectives (2008, unknown): “We collected information from different sources, such as books and articles presenting or comparing national governance systems (e.g. Charkham, 1994; Gugler, 2001; Hopt et al., 1998; Reynolds and Flores, 1989; etc.).”