Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict Between Shareholders
By A. Barnea, Amir Rubin. 2010
2,150 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/256d7d6d92d77858bd8b4f73a1e72f36314f8d61
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Sadok El Ghoul
- Omrane Guedhami
- M. Benlemlih
- H. Jo
- Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez
- Bert Scholtens
- Maretno Agus Harjoto
- George Serafeim
In Strategy and Management
- Bert Scholtens
- M. Benlemlih
- Sadok El Ghoul
- Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez
- H. Jo
- Omrane Guedhami
- Maretno Agus Harjoto
- Lammertjan Dam
Citations in the corpus
- Corporate social responsibility and earnings management in U.S. banks (2014, background): “In a similar vein, Barnea and Rubin (2010) maintain that corporate insiders often seek to over-invest in CSR in pursuit of personal benefits.”
- Managerial Entrenchment and Corporate Social Performance (2008, background): “One strategy that blockholders may follow to expropriate minorities is the overinvestment in CSP (Barnea and Rubin, 2006).”
- The Impact of Board Gender Diversity and Foreign Institutional Investors on the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Engagement of Chinese Listed Companies (2019, result): “Our findings reaffirm results found in developed market contexts [105,106] and still agree with some sense of the political bridge-building concept of foreign investment [107–111].”
- DOES ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE PERFORMANCE INFLUENCE ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE? (2020, background): “Therefore, managers and CEOs are willing to invest in positively perceived governance related activities to enhance sympathy towards the company and achieve a good prestige (Barnea & Rubin, 2010).”
- Going to Haven? Corporate Social Responsibility and Tax Avoidance (2019, methodology): “Barnea and Rubin (2010) examine the relation between firms’ CSR ratings and their ownership and capital structures.”
- Corporate Governance and Performance in Socially Responsible Corporations: New Empirical Insights from a Neo‐Institutional Framework (2013, neutral): “Third, ownership structures (i.e., by block, government, and institutions) can mitigate or exacerbate agency problems (Eng & Mak, 2003; Barnea & Rubin, 2010; Hou & Moore, 2010).”
- Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Debt Maturity (2015, positive): “Boutin-Dufresne and Savaria (2004) highlight the existence of ethical risk: a high CSR level reduces the ethical risk incurred by a firm, which, in turn, reduces the total risk in a given portfolio. Ethical risk includes environmental risk, the risk of fraud or violations, irresponsible business pra”